build: upgrade rusqlite 0.30.0 → 0.31.0#6219
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6219 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 50.85% 22.73% -28.12%
===========================================
Files 112 330 +218
Lines 11811 29705 +17894
===========================================
+ Hits 6006 6753 +747
- Misses 5805 22952 +17147 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
RE: the failing |
|
I opened #6221 for the dep-check failure. |
0db2d16 to
49290b4
Compare
|
Rebasing to pick up #6221; let's merge if it's green! |
|
@ErichDonGubler Thanks for the patch! It looks like the dependency summary might need updating—could you please run: It looks like |
linabutler
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Once the dependency summary is updated (#6219 (comment)), this should be good to go!
|
@linabutler: I promise I will do the dependency summary re-generation! I've ben holding off on bringing this out of draft and handling feedback until I've dealt with a few things that are outstanding for making landing in
Once these are in place, I think this should be good to go. I'm happy to consult on a patch to consume this on the Firefox end, if that helps! |
|
@ErichDonGubler Great to hear that the m-c |
|
@linabutler: While It seems like the repository is being queried for this license file, and that path no longer exists. Okay, the error makes sense, given what we're trying to do. But…what the script is doing actually doesn't make sense to me. 😅 Shouldn't we be using files from the Cargo dependency packages themselves? Anyway, this seems like a blocker for running the script. 🫤 |
49290b4 to
7971a6d
Compare
The pull request has been modified, dismissing previous reviews.
|
Looks like that specific issue might be #6230 |
7971a6d to
9a17ed8
Compare
9258ecc to
a5b540e
Compare
8ae5d15 to
7806d64
Compare
|
Rebased, and finally |
7806d64 to
8dc2e49
Compare
|
The swift failure does look orthogonal, but the dependency check looks related to this. |
8dc2e49 to
9a546c1
Compare
|
@mhammond: Yeah, I've been force-pushing so much in the last few hours because of that check. I needed to run more of the steps captured in I had a slow feedback loop with CI to resolve this; running these steps locally introduces |
Yeah - this is a known footgun - sorry it's so painful, but it lgtm now, thanks! |
|
I guess you want to coordinate landing this with that desktop bug? Let us know when you require that "merge" button hit! |
|
@mhammond: That bug is resolved, so no pressure there (and no hard blockers either, AFAICT). The only consideration I can see at this point is understanding that a |
This PR is intended to unblock duplicate dependencies that would be introduced as new versions of
ahashandhashbrownin Firefox bug 1893057.Pull Request checklist
[ci full]to the PR title.Any new dependencies are accompanied by a summary of the due dilligence applied in selecting them.Branch builds: add
[firefox-android: branch-name]to the PR title.